A Commentary on ‘An Astrologer’s Day’ Essay

The writers description of the astrologist leaves us in no doubt that he is a charlatan his equipment, costume and appearance every(a) have a deliberate, theatrical quality designed to convey the consequence of a mystic power which he does non possess. Notice the originators wryly ironical comment that the abnormal gleam in his eye is really an asidecome of a continual searching for customers and his dry out observation that even a half wits look would sparkle amidst such a painted forehead and Cimmerian whiskers. The deliberate artifice of the astrologist is further underlined by the authors use of phrases such as To crown the effect and This color organisation. The illusion is enhanced by the concomitant that the astrologer works in the eerie glow of a smoky flare which adds to the enchantment of the place.The astrologers customers are depicted as gullible creatures who are irresistibly attracted to him like bees. But although the author portrays the astrologer as a fraud, his open customers are not shown in the light of hapless victims. The writer does not condemn or deride the astrologer as a hirudinean scarcely sees him as a business slice who gives his customers value for m nonpareily he said things which pleased and astonished everyone that was more a matter of study, usage and piercing guesswork. All the same, it was as much an honest humankinds labor as any other, and he deserved the wages he carried home at the devastation of the day.We are told that the astrologer has not chosen his profession by design. Intriguingly, the author informs us that he was once a simple farmer who had to leave home without telling anyone. Although the fact that he had to depart hurriedly and travel far suggests that something dire occurred, the actual argue for his flight is not presumption, thus arousing our curiosity and conferring upon the exiled stranger a sense experience of mystery, more real than he could possibly create for himself in h is false role of astrologer.Whilst he has no mystical powers, the astrologer is a shrewd psychologist. He diagnoses his customers problems by listening to their troubles and supplies them with solace and reassurance. Notice how he is too-careful to either blame his clients woes on other people, or attribute their troubles to elements beyond their control. In this way, they all depart as satisfied customers.Our expectation is moved(p) by the suitably dramatic entrance of the astrologers antagonist. For reasons which stimulate apparent later, the author has cleverly contrived the scene so that the man is initially no more than a dark shape who blots out the solitary shaft of light which remains after the nut vendors departure. Our initial impression of the stranger is unsympathetic he grumbles and truculently challenges the astrologer to prove his worth in the form of a bet. It is further after the bet has been agreed that the astrologer glimpses the mans example whilst the la tter is lighting a charoot. The sight of the mans face seems to shock the astrologer but again we are purposely given no explanation why.The astrologer is so dismayed that he tries to retire from the wager and hurriedly leave but the man is ruthlessly insistent and becomes threatening. Surprisingly, the astrologer agrees to speak but only if the wager is increased to one rupee. Both the reader and the man are surprised to hear the astrologers seemingly miraculous divinations as he accurately describes the mans grisly past. The man is dismayed to learn that his thirst for vindicate cannot be quenched since his enemy is already dead. He is further kayoed to discover that the astrologer have a go at its his name and accepts his admonition to return home and neer travel southward again. The astrologer leaves the man with one consolation he tells him that his enemy received his just deserts by dying a deservedly painful death.Our curiosity is finally satisfied at the end of the st ory when the astrologer goes home and reveals to his wife that the man in headway was in fact the reason why he fled his village. Unbeknown to the man, he had ironically been consulting the very person he had been relentlessly searching for all these years For the astrologer, meeting his old enemy has been doubly rewarding firstly, the association that he is not a murderer has lifted a immense burden of guilt from his mind secondly, he has assured his future guard duty by tricking his antagonist into believing that he is dead. The story fittingly ends with the astrologer sleeping contentedly, having finally laid to rest the ghost of his guilt and successfully warded off the menacing specter of revenge.The authors technique in this story is more subtle than it first appears. Although we are just as surprised as the client when we first hear the astrologers uncannily accurate comments, our surprise is of a different nature since we know what Guru Nayak does not that the astrologe r is a definite fraud. Hence, there is an ironic distancing betwixt the reader and the astrologers antagonist which is further stretched by the fact that he is portrayed as an unsympathetic character.Whereas the initially skeptical Guru Nayak becomes increasingly convinced of the astrologers mystic power, the reader becomes increasingly suspicious, curiously when the astrologer correctly gives his clients name. Unlike Guru Nayak, the reader has not become increasingly mystified and overawed by the astrologers knowledge, but gradually realises that a connection must exist between Guru Nayaks story and the secret of the astrologers past. Hence, whilst the ending satisfies our curiosity, it does not come as a total surprise.We also share the astrologers final sense of relief, partly because we find Guru Nayak unpleasant but mainly because we admire the way in which he skilfully and successfully handles such a crisis of circumstance and manages to extricate himself from an extremely d angerous situation. rise to the occasion, he uses his professional acting skills and sharp wits to turn the tables on his overawed antagonist and transform a perilous predicament into godsend.Finally, the authors effective use of irony is worth commenting. Near the reference of the story, he writes that the astrologer knew no more of what was going to happen to others than he knew what was going to happen to himself next minute. Given what is about to occur, these linguistic communication become prophetically ironic. Note also the wry irony of the astrologers final complaint to his wife (The swine has cheated me) when he himself had perpetrated the greater untruth and cleverly cheated Guru Nayak of his revenge. Lastly, the matter-of-fact title is a masterpiece of ironic understatement. An Astrologers Day implies that the story will describe an average out or typical day in the astrologer life whereas the typesetters case related is both extraordinary and fateful.