Safety vs. Freedom

Americans take pride in their individual independences supra pencil eraser. We as Americans watch fought for our license since the building of our great farming. In the past, the tidy sum of America in any casek pride in their immunity as a nation and a group of batch. During the time, safety was an irrelevant issue. However, as time progressed to what we work out a contemporaneous society safety became a co-existing factor in the systematic balance. Constant threats and dreadful attacks have been made by people because they were considered to have too much granting immunity.Safety in our everyday lives did non become prompted until people have taken drastic measures to ensure their immunity. potencyful measures have been taken by people because too much freedom was placed into the hands of the people. The correlativity of freedom and safety now lingers onto a thin delicate balance that can be toppled when at that place is too much of freedom or safety. In straight aways contemporaneous society, people not only want freedom, but they also smell out the need for safety in their everyday lives. H. L. Mencken (18801956) wrote, The average macrocosm does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe. His statement everywhere the topic may have been true for the time, but in todays society, matters have changed dramatically in that safety and freedom be needed. The topic of freedom and safety has been constantly debated. In order to amply understand the situation, definitions must be provided. Freedom is defined as the provide or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without bridle or restraint. In other words, freedom is a world-beater that is passed d accept to the people from the local and national government. On the other hand, safety is defined as the condition of being protected from or incredible to cause danger, risk, or injury.Interestingly enough, these definitions overlap. Ambiguity and confusion come along to be interw oven in this case. These definitions atomic number 18 an underline proof that the average man desires both freedom and safety. No matter how the question is phrased, the same pragmatic, knotty response should be given. Freedom and safety atomic number 18 relative to each(prenominal) other, usually tipping back and forth like a seesaw. The balance amongst each virtue is rather delicate, but always negotiable, depending on the form of events at home or even internationally.Freedom is the benchmark of the American pry system. As long as Americans remain to place importance on freedom, it leave endure. Safety is equally significant, but often manipulated. Most Americans seem to be rather susceptible when it comes to the safety of the nation state and will usually agree with legislation that will make us safer. To this discussion, thither are usually two opposing sides. The sides in this situation are people who stay faithful to pure freedom and people who are aficionados of saf ety.Some people have belief that freedom is the only thing that matters and that freedom should be the prioritized factor across the nation. On the other hand, thither are people who believe that safety is more important. On both sides, however, there is always an argument involved with gun chair. Recently, there has been an uncontrollable force that has swept across America and that is the use of guns for mass murdering. The Sandy reverse incident left people traumatized. During this issue, people who stand true in safety want nothing less than the ban of wielding arms. the stronger our gun control laws are, the fewer acts of violence. (Sandy Hook quotes). At the same time, those for freedom stable want to be able to wield arms even though such tragic events have occurred. Even though there is a constant heated debate over the topic of freedom verses safety, there always has to be a fine line that defines both freedom and safety. With the latest shooting tragedy in Colorado, gun control is doubtless on everyones mind. People who have a stance with pro-gun seem to call down freedom, liberty and the 2nd amendment while talking about their right to ship guns.And people who are anti-gun might cite the safety and well-being of the oecumenic public, as criminals and people with mental disorders will not have such easy access to weapons that kill. People who say that freedom and safety have no correlations, and that safety is more important than freedom or freedom is more important that safety, have not considered its daily applications. In society today, people demand both freedom and safety. While more and more Americans demand freedom to do things as they please, they want the sense of protection and safety.Safety is needed when more freedom is given. An example of this lies in our homes. As children have later curfews as they grow older, their parents demand for more of their own protection for their children. Ultimately, curfews are reasonable guidel ines and should be followed. It is important to maintain follow for your parents and the rules they set throughout your adolescent years. While it may seem foul or unreasonable at the time, you will eventually realize how ripe such rules were and will thank your parents for looking out for your well-being. (Why Curfews Should Be Enforced).This correlation is evidence that with more freedom, people need more safety to prevail them in check and to keep people in line. Freedom in this case cannot exist without the need for safety and safety is not obligatory if there is no freedom. Freedom and safety are desired by everyone. However, unlike popular belief, they cannot be separated. Like a well-balanced formula, freedom and safety intertwine in a well-defined system. In this contemporary society, freedom is important for the liberties of the people however, safety is important for the security of the people. both(prenominal) freedom and safety are important factors for people tod ay.