Ethos, Pathos, and Logos

Ethos, shame and Logos heretofore some star living under a rock has most likely hear of the ongoing debate for and a larnst outsourcing. Outsourcing is defined as enlisting help from an outside provider or manu occurrenceurer in beau monde to gain profit. To make someone gain interest in ones fool on something such(prenominal) as outsourcing, one needs to make a coaxing argument. A good persuasive argument contains three aspects ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos is established in the character or displayed character of the author or speaker.Logos accustoms logical systemal evidence or reason usu in ally with facts or statistics. Pathos conjure ups to the lecturers emotions. doubting Thomas Friedman, three-time Pulitzer Prize-winning author and The New York Times columnist, subroutines rhetoric to increase the persuasiveness of his pro-outsourcing article The Great Indian Dream. Meanwhile, David Moberg, senior editor and contributor to legion(predicate) national publicatio ns, uses different examples using the alike tools in his anti-outsourcing article High-tech Hijack. Articles, such as these for and against outsourcing, use rhetorical opinion by citing different examples and facts to add attract to a circumstantial view. The Great Indian Dream, the pro-outsourcing essay, contains several examples of persuasion using rhetoric. Thomas Friedman discusses how India came to be a workforce to argue with, in a logical and substantially understood approach. Friedman demonstrates k immediatelyledge on the cave in intercourse by acknowledging the opposing argument that outsourcing displace be bad news from a competition point of view, but claims at that place is a solution.Friedman, citing what an Indian executive in one case told him, explains how all the united States needs to do to eliminate concern for outsourcing is redouble their efforts at program line and research(Friedman). This is a very persuasive statement be face it establishes the character of the writer devising him seem unbiased with this frank solution. Pathos is often demonstrated with the use of children, animals, and memories to evoke an aflame solution from the lector. In The Great Indian Dream, Thomas Friedman applies this proficiency using his nine year-old daughter and his imagined granddaughter.Friedman adds persuasion to his argument by appealing to the readers whiz of awe. This is shown through the white of a childs solution to questions approximately where products come from. This emotional response tends to make the example more relatable for the reader. In addition to using children to rock, pathos fag similarly be seen in the bring up taken from Rajesh Rao while public lecture about how the Statesn executives now know straightlaced Hindi greetings. Mr. Rao, a softwargon merchandising manager from India, states, A few old age ago nobody in America wanted to talk to us.Now they are eager(Friedman). This statement attempts to ma ke the reader go through a sense of sadness for the Indians out front offshoring began, and a feeling of happiness now that it has begun. The last element of persuasion, logos, provides the greatest prudence of logical reasoning for favoring a specific view. For example, Friedman shines a light on the time-zone difference, which al kickoffs for a continuous workday between the United States and India. With the chance to develop ones own company nonstop by working 24 hours a day, who wouldnt logically make this choice?Furthermore, India contains 555 one thousand thousand people under the age of 25, all raised with a strong idiom on education. Friedman reveals this image of India which is comprised of so many another(prenominal) young and intelligent individuals that make the soil the obvious place to go in search of a large amount of notes of less expensive employees. High-tech hijack, an anti-outsourcing essay, demonstrates the resembling principles of persuasion in an atte mpt to warp the reader to oppose outsourcing.David Moberg also gained a great deal of credibility on outsourcing by winning the Max Steinbeck lay out from the International Labor Communications connecter and a Project Censored trophy for his coverage of labor issues. Moberg cites several respected sources, such as IDC, a semiprivate IT research firm, University of California Berkeley, and Economic indemnity Institute, which only adds to the persuasion of his argument making it that much more supported. Using super respected sources and discussing a solution to the problem by means of government lawmaking displays ethos for his position.Moberg points out a study of the clear over sacrificement of corporate positions found that Executive pay for the 50 largest outsourcers of service jobs increased dramatically in 2003 to 28 percent supra the average for large-company CEOs(Moberg). This alarming number he uses, combined with the rising unemployment rate, renders a sense of c ontempt in the reader towards these money driven executives. Secondly, Mr. Moberg uses a beginning(a)-hand example, with the story of Stephen gentry to express his relatable emotions felt by many.Gentry, a fifteen year technical software engineer for Boeing, worked fulltime while earning a computer-science degree and was strained to train his Indian replacements before existence fired. After beingness unemployed for eighteen months, Stephen Gentry describes Ameri chamberpot corporations as so greedy and cutthroat-oriented they dont tuition about me, you or anybody else except their piece of tail line(Moberg). This quote, taken from an individual with attend in the subject, persuades the reader showing a signifi tin cant emotional experience caused by outsourcing. Mr.Moberg presents the use of logos while talking about several credible studies regarding offshoring. The first study conducted by University of California Berkeley estimates that 14 million service jobs are vulne rable. This keel number persuades the reader against outsourcing which is logically the cause of the United States high unemployment problem. Both articles have good examples of persuasion, but both also seem to put their own purl on what facts to omit. Friedmans position, being domineering regarding offshoring, shapes his argument in many ways.First, he fails to mention all the jobs lost in America due to outsourcing, yet he puts a positive spin on the subject by discussing how greatly it is support Indias economy. Secondly, Friedman also mentions that the United States can simply fix the problem they are facing by working quatern times as hard towards education and research. According to Outsourcing decision support a survey of benefits, risks, and decision factors a torpid academic, an academic article by Tibor Kremic, The mixer costs of outsourcing may be heavy to quantify but they can be significant.Outsourcing may result in low morale, high absenteeism, lower productiv ity, etc. Friedman leaves this fact out while Moberg seems to stress it. Meanwhile, Moberg, being anti-outsourcing, fails to mention the great economic touch on on India, and instead he focuses more often than not on the mass unemployment generated solely in America. Friedman also claims the resolution for the problem lies majorly on government legislation and should be restore through new stricter laws.Whether pro or against the issue, its easy to see how a basic argument can be shaped using ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the reader. By using these rhetorical tools one can appeal to any reader through a basic emotional response. Either emotion or logic can completely lose its appeal however without ethos by the writer. Both readers use pathos and logos well, but when it comes to ethos David Moberg takes the cake. empty words along with using specific facts can be the difference when it comes to persuading the public in favor of a certain view one holds.